Case Study: How a Bargarh Contractor Tracks 26+ JCBs, Poklains & Generators

This is a fuel monitoring case study centred on Tushar Nandi, a contractor based in Bargarh, Odisha, who operates a mixed fleet of more than 26 JCBs, poklains, and generators. His fleet has run on BPN-TRACK fuel monitoring for roughly 4–5 years, making it one of our longer-running customer relationships and a useful example of what fuel monitoring looks like at real, sustained scale rather than as a short trial.

Background: A Fuel Monitoring Case Study From Bargarh

Contracting work involving heavy equipment like JCBs and poklains means machines are frequently deployed across multiple sites, often operated by different personnel across shifts, and regularly left running or idle for extended periods as part of normal earthmoving and construction work. Generators supplement this fleet for on-site power needs. India’s construction and mining equipment sector, tracked by the Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade, has grown steadily alongside infrastructure spending — and fleets like this one are exactly where that growth meets an old, unsolved problem: nobody could independently verify whether diesel consumption across 26+ machines matched actual work being done.

The challenge

With a fleet this large and this mobile, the core challenge wasn’t a single incident of theft — it was the absence of any baseline to compare against. Without continuous fuel-level data, there was no way to distinguish normal heavy-duty consumption from loss, and no way to hold any single machine, site, or shift accountable for unusual fuel patterns. At this scale, manual fuel logging across dozens of machines simply isn’t practical to sustain accurately over years of operation.

The solution

BPN-TRACK fuel monitoring GPS devices were fitted across the fleet’s JCBs, poklains, and generators, giving each machine its own continuous fuel-level and location record. This let consumption be tracked machine-by-machine and site-by-site, rather than relying on fleet-wide totals that could hide problems on individual machines. Over 4–5 years of use, this has become a standard part of how the fleet is managed day to day, not a one-time audit tool.

Fuel Monitoring Case Study Results

The most significant outcome has been sustained, ongoing visibility rather than a single dramatic discovery: fuel patterns that would previously have been invisible across a fleet this large and this spread out are now trackable per machine, which supports both theft prevention and more informed operational decisions about where and how equipment is being used. The fact that this fleet has continued using BPN-TRACK for 4–5 years is itself a meaningful result — long-term retention on a fleet this size reflects monitoring that has remained genuinely useful in day-to-day operations, not just at initial setup.

For a contractor fleet this size, the practical value has also extended beyond fuel alone. Location history across 26+ machines makes it possible to confirm equipment is deployed where it’s supposed to be, which matters when machines move between multiple active sites and contracts. Over a multi-year deployment, that combination of fuel accountability and location visibility has become part of how the fleet is run day to day, rather than a tool reserved for periodic audits or investigations after something has already gone wrong.

FAQ

See the full guide: Fuel Theft Detection — Complete Guide